Tuesday, 20 February 2018
SONGWRITING : How to write poetry and mark the scansion and musical meter and prosody for melody in music.
First to write a ballade, or sonnet a traditional 14 line poem, you can write it like
Petrarch, who wrote an octave, that is two qautrains (4 lines each ) for his thesis a total of 8, and then another (6 lines being, 2 tercets of 3 lines of verse) for his sestet, as his proposition or concluding thought or opinion with two tercets.
You can write a Spenserian sonnet with 7 couplets as your verses.
You can write a Terza Rima like Dante, with 4 -3 line tercets for twelve plus another two lines of verse for a total of 14 with and 1- 2 line couplet.
You can try writing like Chaucer, with 4 tercets, 3 lines of verse each and 1 couplet, to make a total of 14 lines for your sonnet / ballade.
You can write a sonnet like Shakespeare with 3 qautrains with 4 verses each and 1 couplet with two verses.
It does not matter how you write it, the modern pop songs have 3 verses and two choruses.
So write either 3 quatrains for twelve verses rhyming every other line.
Use and AB, AB rhyme scheme and then for the hook, your chorus write a 2 line couplet as your chorus. That makes a sonnet of 14 verses or lines.
You can repeat the chorus, as many times as you like in your song.
To start, think of a concept, what you want to write about, that is your over all theme.
Brainstorm through stream of consciousness as many ideas as you can, jot them down in point form quickly.
Then organize words that you want to use to make a key point, elaborate on that idea, write a paragraph about it. 4 lines, try to rhyme the end syllable of every other line.
A
B
A
B
Use that pattern.
Then write two more.
Think of an over all statement that sums up the theme and the concept in your verses.
That will be your Premise.
The Hook.
The Chorus. It is your 2 line couplet!
Now you are done with the poem, here is how to mark the scansions for meter and for prosody to find the melody of your music.
Scansions, when they are musical notation, and metric, measures, are bars in music, Ams, 4 beats or notes, and the phonemes, syllables, one per beat, in either, 1/4 or 2/8 or 4/16 depending on the cantillation of the prosody in the vowels, both the primary and the secondary, each being stressed according to it's type of syntax in grammar, nouns, having initial stress at the front, and verbs having the end, or usual (but not always penultimate stress), then the scansion should reflect actual real scansion and musical notation.
The syllables, one phoneme per beat or note, having either 1 quater note for (L) light weight vowels or (H) for heavy weight vowels 2 quarter notes or 3 quarter notes for superheavy vowels, it is rare to have 4 notes for a vowel but is possible.
That is one way, to mark the prosody, with Longue being 4 notes = 1 Am / Bar and Breve Short being 2 is another way to mark the scansion , like the medieval music notation for chants.
Another way to mark prosody it to specifically keep the phones /phonemes marked as on per syllable and one per note or beat in the 4/4 time/ tempo of an Am /Bar/ measure of music.
To mark the exact prosody, and to write music , then mark the cantillation for each vowel, with it's prosody being dynamic (S) Fortis Strong and (L) or (W) Lax, for Lenis or Weak dynamic based on the voiced or unvoiced consonants or vowels in the prior note/ syllable. Being marked F LOUD and P for Soft or quiet, and there is varying degree of 1 through 5 FFFF or MF or MP PPPP that is your dynamic, and it will indicate the phase or strength of frequency or colour degree of the clarity and resonance of the note when it is voiced, and the prosaic quality of the register/ pitch/ tonality the rise and fall, is the exact cantillation of the vowel enunciation, of melody and prosody with light syllables having one,ornament or figure and heavy having two notes and super heavy three with the mid being the highest point, starting at the lowest raising to mid then back to tonic or the previous note, it should be raised up if it is voiced, and lowered if unvoiced in the prior syllable or consonant.
So in that way, the note, a beat, the tone a 1/4 can be subdivided as each IPA International Phonetic Alphabet would suggest, as to how to enunciate the vowel, then subdivide the note each beat, one per syllable/ phoneme or segment of the etymology of the word, based on the onset, nucleus,and coda, the nucleus being the vowel usually, so divide it as 1/16 for light weight vowel, 2/16 ornament or figure for heavy, and for super heavy three ,so 3/16 notes, it is rare but possible to have 4/16 for heavier vowel combination.
In that way each cell, or note, has further division into figures as ornament for the vowel intonation cantillation per beat. If you prefer to make it like the chant music of middle ages, then use as breve 2 notes of the 4 in one Am, or Bar as counting as one scansion, and for heavy make a figure of 4 beats or notes, and super heavy 6 notes, with short being Breve, and Longue being 4 notes, that is the other way, and then mark prosody of the vowels as motifs/ figures for the pattern of rime.
Choose words to fit on the next line that match its rime, the syllable marking of scansion and prosody for the onset, and rime, being nucleus and coda.
That is the proper way to mark the scansions for music. Then the poem becomes a ballade or song! :)
~Krista Kaufman 2018-02-20
Petrarch, who wrote an octave, that is two qautrains (4 lines each ) for his thesis a total of 8, and then another (6 lines being, 2 tercets of 3 lines of verse) for his sestet, as his proposition or concluding thought or opinion with two tercets.
You can write a Spenserian sonnet with 7 couplets as your verses.
You can write a Terza Rima like Dante, with 4 -3 line tercets for twelve plus another two lines of verse for a total of 14 with and 1- 2 line couplet.
You can try writing like Chaucer, with 4 tercets, 3 lines of verse each and 1 couplet, to make a total of 14 lines for your sonnet / ballade.
You can write a sonnet like Shakespeare with 3 qautrains with 4 verses each and 1 couplet with two verses.
It does not matter how you write it, the modern pop songs have 3 verses and two choruses.
So write either 3 quatrains for twelve verses rhyming every other line.
Use and AB, AB rhyme scheme and then for the hook, your chorus write a 2 line couplet as your chorus. That makes a sonnet of 14 verses or lines.
You can repeat the chorus, as many times as you like in your song.
To start, think of a concept, what you want to write about, that is your over all theme.
Brainstorm through stream of consciousness as many ideas as you can, jot them down in point form quickly.
Then organize words that you want to use to make a key point, elaborate on that idea, write a paragraph about it. 4 lines, try to rhyme the end syllable of every other line.
A
B
A
B
Use that pattern.
Then write two more.
Think of an over all statement that sums up the theme and the concept in your verses.
That will be your Premise.
The Hook.
The Chorus. It is your 2 line couplet!
Now you are done with the poem, here is how to mark the scansions for meter and for prosody to find the melody of your music.
Scansions, when they are musical notation, and metric, measures, are bars in music, Ams, 4 beats or notes, and the phonemes, syllables, one per beat, in either, 1/4 or 2/8 or 4/16 depending on the cantillation of the prosody in the vowels, both the primary and the secondary, each being stressed according to it's type of syntax in grammar, nouns, having initial stress at the front, and verbs having the end, or usual (but not always penultimate stress), then the scansion should reflect actual real scansion and musical notation.
The syllables, one phoneme per beat or note, having either 1 quater note for (L) light weight vowels or (H) for heavy weight vowels 2 quarter notes or 3 quarter notes for superheavy vowels, it is rare to have 4 notes for a vowel but is possible.
That is one way, to mark the prosody, with Longue being 4 notes = 1 Am / Bar and Breve Short being 2 is another way to mark the scansion , like the medieval music notation for chants.
Another way to mark prosody it to specifically keep the phones /phonemes marked as on per syllable and one per note or beat in the 4/4 time/ tempo of an Am /Bar/ measure of music.
To mark the exact prosody, and to write music , then mark the cantillation for each vowel, with it's prosody being dynamic (S) Fortis Strong and (L) or (W) Lax, for Lenis or Weak dynamic based on the voiced or unvoiced consonants or vowels in the prior note/ syllable. Being marked F LOUD and P for Soft or quiet, and there is varying degree of 1 through 5 FFFF or MF or MP PPPP that is your dynamic, and it will indicate the phase or strength of frequency or colour degree of the clarity and resonance of the note when it is voiced, and the prosaic quality of the register/ pitch/ tonality the rise and fall, is the exact cantillation of the vowel enunciation, of melody and prosody with light syllables having one,ornament or figure and heavy having two notes and super heavy three with the mid being the highest point, starting at the lowest raising to mid then back to tonic or the previous note, it should be raised up if it is voiced, and lowered if unvoiced in the prior syllable or consonant.
So in that way, the note, a beat, the tone a 1/4 can be subdivided as each IPA International Phonetic Alphabet would suggest, as to how to enunciate the vowel, then subdivide the note each beat, one per syllable/ phoneme or segment of the etymology of the word, based on the onset, nucleus,and coda, the nucleus being the vowel usually, so divide it as 1/16 for light weight vowel, 2/16 ornament or figure for heavy, and for super heavy three ,so 3/16 notes, it is rare but possible to have 4/16 for heavier vowel combination.
In that way each cell, or note, has further division into figures as ornament for the vowel intonation cantillation per beat. If you prefer to make it like the chant music of middle ages, then use as breve 2 notes of the 4 in one Am, or Bar as counting as one scansion, and for heavy make a figure of 4 beats or notes, and super heavy 6 notes, with short being Breve, and Longue being 4 notes, that is the other way, and then mark prosody of the vowels as motifs/ figures for the pattern of rime.
Choose words to fit on the next line that match its rime, the syllable marking of scansion and prosody for the onset, and rime, being nucleus and coda.
That is the proper way to mark the scansions for music. Then the poem becomes a ballade or song! :)
~Krista Kaufman 2018-02-20
Monday, 12 February 2018
Documentary Film Watch Free Here!
https://www.nfb.ca/film/capturing_reality/
Capturing Reality: The Art of Documentary
In this feature-length film on the art of the documentary, director Pepita Ferrari interviews 33 leading documentarians and shows clips from over 50 films. From cinéma-vérité pioneers like Albert Maysles and Michel Brault to mavericks like Errol Morris and Nick Broomfield, it explores the challenges of capturing reality on film. Directors as diverse as Pakistani feminist Sabiha Sumar and new media guru Peter Wintonick reflect on ethical issues and the contested status of the “truth.”
Featured interviews include German iconoclast Werner Herzog; Chilean filmmaker Patricio Guzmán; British director Kim Longinotto and Alanis Obomsawin, the First Lady of First Nations cinema. Visit Capturing Reality for additional interviews and background.
Featured interviews include German iconoclast Werner Herzog; Chilean filmmaker Patricio Guzmán; British director Kim Longinotto and Alanis Obomsawin, the First Lady of First Nations cinema. Visit Capturing Reality for additional interviews and background.
To be a transitive verb ; or not to be a verb ?To instead be, yes, a split infinitive, and an intransitive verbal, but can I do that ;is the real question?
To answer it, one must determine what the predicate is, and if the semantic meaning and interpretation of emperia, experience,through aisthetia,perceived things, determines it to be so; or not.
If the adjunct, being predicate, determines it to be done to or for someone or something, then it is transitive. It will have a direct object oblique, and / or an indirect object argument.
If the action or state of being, in it's extent, is perfect, unto itself, and does no action, to, or for another person, place or thing, then it is intransitive, because it has no direct object case, oblique,constituent argument, or indirect object, possessive case extent of constituent valence to an argument thetan, fact or element, for semantic purpose predicate of being who the action was done to or for, or given to or done for, if at all?
To be an advocate, for a client. (Transitive) (Conceit)
To be an advocate, a lawyer. (Intransitive) (Concept)
To instead be, a split infinitive, a transitive verbal and not a verb, can I split it?
If I want to say:
I want to go, quickly to the store.
That has "I want to go " as a subject, topic theme, focus, I , and want, to go, as want is my verb, and to go quickly to the store, is part of the predicate.
Can I split to go? Yes.
I can do so, I can split it, but, is it correct, only if the focus of my communication is to say ; I want to go quickly that should be my focus. How quickly I go , will be my emphasis.
I can, split, the oblique, the constituent parts, adjunct to the word instead, therefore, topicalizing it to the forefront of the sentence, or segment of syntax, to rheme and cause focus on it as topic.
I used hyperbatton, to add instead, the predicate, which adds semantic meaning for interpretation to the relevant right valency, instead of the usual relevant left, as by doing so , it then rhemes, focuses attention on the theme and topic I want to highlight for your notice.
In that situation I can do so as a "split infinitive" is a concept, an intransitive verbal noun like thing, a concept standing on it's own basis as extent.
However, if I were to say:
" I am going, to quickly go, to the store now."
Can I "split" the finitive verbs, if it is a conceit, an action, yes!
Will it change the structure, YES! If split, it will no longer remain an infinitive, the segment of syntax in grammar will alter!
I can do so, because by splitting it, I am trying to rheme it, to focus your attention on the topic of the sentence which I want you to take notice of; and that is, that I go quickly.
In the above , it still doesn't focus on how quickly I went, when I split it, to say, to quickly go, the, I am going, was in the right position as constituent so it made it the highest focus.
I go quickly, is a sentence fragment by itself, but at the end of the previous sentence I used to go as an infinitive verbal description adjunct rhemed to the relevant right of quickly, so going, is a thing, a noun, that I did, an action, but it is not a verb in that instance, am going, as it is describing the verb in the end sentence dependent clause, that can not stand on it's own but is subordinate to main independent clause.
So in that case, when I used the words, to quickly go, as a "thing" a noun, then it is an infinitive a verbal, not a verb and in that case can not be split!
"To quickly", is the new infinitive, it is a noun, a thing, I did, going, quickly.
An adjective modifier, adjunct to go.
So when, to go , or, to be or any words, like it , to quickly, are used in that way they can not be split.
They are an adjective description of another segment, and as a verbal, now a noun, a thing it can not be split, if it is split, and technically I showed it can be done, but in doing so alters the structure and the segments of syntax and their parts and constituents and changes and alters how the interpretation of the sentence is understood.
However, if it is used as a constituent, to the verb as a modifer, as adjective, again a verbal, a noun now, to quickly, the new infinitive, and go being the verb referrent back to am going.
I am splitting to go, by inserting quickly, it becomes like, an adjective describing go, a noun referrent, because, becomes, it's constituent,adjective, description, when I do so.
To joins then, as part of quickly, and, to quickly, became the infinitive, and not to go.
Go changes to the verb refferent noun,while, to quickly is topicalized as the modifier, to the relevant right moving it there using hyberbattan, to focus the importance on how quickly I go, instead of saying , I go quickly, and going being the important fact and quickly only an after thought.
But I want the emphasis and focus to be on going, quickly. So I still want to edit it more and change it structure again.
So decide, what do you want the reader to focus on? What key point or fact is the most important for them to know?
Move the important points to the right side and the after thought, of secondary importance to the left side as an adjunct, modifier, being either and adjective or adverb, a constituent to the segment of syntax, it's argument.
Arguments being either the subject noun, sometimes the topic or theme (the agent/actor doing said action) the action being the verb, and the person whom the action is done to the patient, and the instrument being the item used to do the action.Those are also sometimes the topic or theme.
Highlight the focus on the topic or theme by moving it to the front of the sentence, or the front of that part or segment of syntax of phrase structure grammar.
In this case I want to focus on how quickly I went, and make that fact dramatic and clear that the fact I went quickly is my point.
Here is how it is hyperbattaned, topicalizing the theme, my point, to the front of the sentence.
Quickly, I go, now, to the store. Active. Urgent.
That sentence changed the focus.
Quickly is the adjective, topicalized, to the relevant right to highlight it, and I go, becomes active, in the moment, rather than saying to go, which is passive and a in the first sentence I want, to go, to the store is more passive, casual, not urgent, the tone is different when the infinitive verbal is used instead of the active urgent in the moment structure.
If I split the first sentence we alter it's structure.
Can we yes, but splitting the infinitive changed it.
The "want to go" with to go, was changed to "to quickly go", can I do this?
Yes, but when I did, to go was no longer the infinitive, so it is a trick question!
You can't split an infinitive, because in doing so , it alters its form and becomes a different element of syntax in the phrase structure of grammar if you do!
So full answer, yes you can do so, but it alters the whole meaning of the sentence and will not remain an infinitive if you do!
If you need it to remain an infinitive then do not split it!
You can split it but then it will no longer be an infinitive, then in the next attempt , the "to quickly" became the infinitive, a verbal, a noun, as it is a thing, I did ,to quickly, is describing go, which changed to the verb referrent, go then became a noun, a thing, so the "trick" of the question, is can you split the infinitive, yes, but not without altering and changing it, because then go became the verb referrent, back to , am going, as the verb!
Splitting it changes, the phrase structure and the semantic meaning. So if you need to communicate that exact thing, then do not alter it.
You can and should try to edit and alter it to see if there is a more effective way to write it , to communicate the focus and tone.
Show what is really important to you, to the reader, and signal what you want them to understand as being most important to you.
Put that on the right hand side as a constituent, and the less important to the relevant left side constituent of the segment.
Each segment of syntax in grammar, can be topicalized, but altering it does change it's semantic meaning.
If the "Subject Agent/Actor" is at the front then the voice and style , it is an active sentence and a formal.
If the " Patient, Direct Object Person/Place /Thing" , the action is done to or for, or the "Instrument" it is done with, the indirect object, obliques, constituents, then if those are moved to the front, to the relevant right of the sentence then the voice or style of writing is said to be passive and informal.
Quickly going now, to the store. Passive. Casual.
See how altering it changes tone? Mood. Semantic meaning!
See how I used hyperbattan to move the subject to the front again in this sentence, if it is the subject, the topic, I want to highlight, and by raising it to the fore, moving it to the relevant right side as a constituent to a segment of grammar then I focus the attention to it.
Most, adjuncts, being modifiers, adjectives, and adverbial modifiers,normally go to the relevant left side as a constituent to the argument, a fact, an element of the sentence, whether that element is the subject, the topic,the theme, or the subject as being focused on the agent the actor doing the action, to or for the direct object, whom, has the action done to it, as an oblique, objective case segment of syntax, or the thing which is used as an instrument to do it to them, the indirect possessive case argument, and it's constituents.
When it has one direct object or both direct and indirect objects then it is a transitive verb being the action!
Each argument can have one or more constituent descriptive adjunct modifiers for each argument, a fact, each segment of syntax has it's own relevant left side and more important focus of attention and cause of notice and impact to the semantic meaning understanding and helps the interpretation of the whole part, is the relevant right side constituent adjunct!
Usually each modifier, goes to the left, but to highlight it and move it to the relevant right side of the part of the sentence you want highlighted and to have people take notice topicalize it to the right, fore front of the segment of syntax.
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/606/01/
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/sentences.htm
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarlyvoice/sentencestructure
http://individual.utoronto.ca/ajhicks/grammar_html.html
"TO BE" IS A CONCEIT AS IT IS CIETO KINEO TO SHAPE OR FORM OR RENDER DESIGN ,TO ACT OR DO OR BE,TO SOMEONE OR SOMETHING,OR FOR SOMEONE OR SOMETHING AN ACTION OR BEING OR DOING TO THEM SOMETHING; WHERE AS "NOT TO BE" IS A CONCEPT AS IT IS APART SEPARATE LAYERS OF DETAILS,EXPOSITION OF THETAN, FACTS, ELEMENTS PERCEIVED, OF, A PERSON,PLACE OR THING, BUT IS NOT ACTING, OR BEING,OR DOING, ANYTHING TO, OR FOR, ANOTHER; SO "NOT TO BE" AS A CONCEPT IS INTRANSITIVE WITH NO DIRECT OR INDIRECT OBJECT IT ACTS TOWARDS OR FOR; AND "TO BE" IS A CONCEIT AND IS ACTION CHARGE, VALUE, DETERMINATION, CON TOGETHER CIETO/KINEO MOTION AND MOVEMENT TOWARDS, OR FOR, A PERSON, PLACE, OR THING, DIRECT OBJECT, OR INDIRECT OBJECT, AND IS TRANSITIVE CHANGING FORM, BEING, DOING, MOTION MOVEMENT, ACTION, TO OR FOR, SOMEONE OR SOMETHING, SO TRANSITIVE IS WHAT TO BE IS CONSIDERING, IN THE DECISION OF PREDICATE.
PREDICATE; PRE BEFORE, DI TWO, CATE AFTER, SO AS KANT WOULD SAY, COMPARE AND CONTRAST,THE EXTENT, REFLECT, DOES IT UPON REFLECTION COMPARE LIKEN TO A GROUP LATIVE TO SOMEONE OR SOMETHING, A CONCEIT, OR APART APO AWAY ABLATIVE CASE, A CONCEPT, WHEN REFLECTING UPON WHAT PHRASE STRUCTURE TO USE AS PART OF GRAMMAR WHEN DECIDING, DISPOCITO, STRUCTURE AND STYLE, PLACEMENT OF TYPE AND KIND OF PHRASE,AS ARISTOTLE'S POETICS EDUCATES US , WHEN COMPOSING, IN THE INSTANCE, WRITING AND DOCUMENTING FACTS EXPOSITION, NARRATIVE DETAIL AND WHEN BEING FLUENT, EASILY DETERMINING PARTS OF SYNTAX,DETERMINING PHRASES, DE OF, TERM TO SHAPE FORM CALL INTO BEING, IN IT'S ESSENCE AND NATURE,THE INATE FACTS, BORN OF,AND FROM, SEMIOTICS SIGNS, SYNEDOCHE REPRESENTATION NOMINALIZATION OF, IVUS IZE TO SHAPE TO FORM, INTO PHRASES,THE CONSTITUENTS ,OF THE MAIN ARGUMENTS, AS I SAY OR THINK AND BELIEVE IT IS UNDERSTOOD OR EXPERIENCED THROUGH EMPERIA OR AISTHETIA PERCEPTIBLE THINGS.
~KRISTA KAUFMAN 2018-02-12
TO BE OR NOT TO BE ; PHRASE STRUCTURE GRAMMAR, AND HOW TO APPLY STYLE FOR COMPOSITIONS?
To be a transitive verb ; or not to be a verb ?To instead be, yes, a split infinitive, and an intransitive verbal, but can I do that ;is the real question?
To answer it, one must determine what the predicate is, and if the semantic meaning and interpretation of emperia, experience,through aisthetia,perceived things, determines it to be so; or not.
If the adjunct, being predicate, determines it to be done to or for someone or something, then it is transitive. It will have a direct object oblique, and / or an indirect object argument.
If the action or state of being, in it's extent, is perfect, unto itself, and does no action, to, or for another person, place or thing, then it is intransitive, because it has no direct object case, oblique,constituent argument, or indirect object, possessive case extent of constituent valence to an argument thetan, fact or element, for semantic purpose predicate of being who the action was done to or for, or given to or done for, if at all?
To be an advocate, for a client. (Transitive) (Conceit)
To be an advocate, a lawyer. (Intransitive) (Concept)
To instead be, a split infinitive, a transitive verbal and not a verb, can I split it?
If I want to say:
I want to go, quickly to the store.
That has "I want to go " as a subject, topic theme, focus, I , and want, to go, as want is my verb, and to go quickly to the store, is part of the predicate.
Can I split to go? Yes.
I can do so, I can split it, but, it is correct, but only because if the focus of my communication is to say ; I want to go quickly that should be my focus. How quickly I go , will be my emphasis.
I can, split, the oblique, the constituent parts, adjunct to the word instead, therefore, topicalizing it to the forefront of the sentence, or segment of syntax, to rheme and cause focus on it as topic.
I used hyperbatton, to add instead, the predicate, which adds semantic meaning for interpretation to the relevant left valency, instead of the usual relevant right, as by doing so , it then rhemes, focuses attention on the theme and topic I want to highlight for your notice.
In that situation I can do so as a "split infinitive" is a concept, an intransitive verbal noun like thing, a concept standing on it's own basis as extent.
However, if I were to say:
" I am going, to quickly go, to the store now."
Can I "split" the finitive verbs, if it is a conceit, an action, yes!
Will it change the structure, YES! If split, it will no longer remain an infinitive, the segment of syntax in grammar will alter!
I can do so, because by splitting it, I am trying to rheme it, to focus your attention on the topic of the sentence which I want you to take notice of; and that is, that I go quickly.
In the above , it still doesn't focus on how quickly I went, when I split it, to say, to quickly go, the, I am going, was in the right position as constituent so it made it the highest focus.
I go quickly, is a sentence fragment by itself, but at the end of the previous sentence I used to go as an infinitive verbal description adjunct rhemed to the relevant right of quickly, so going, is a thing, a noun, that I did, an action, but it is not a verb in that instance, am going, as it is describing the verb in the end sentence dependent clause, that can not stand on it's own but is subordinate to main independent clause.
So in that case, when I used the words, to quickly go, as a "thing" a noun, then it is an infinitive a verbal, not a verb and in that case can not be split!
"To quickly", is the new infinitive, it is a noun, a thing, I did, going, quickly.
An adjective modifier, adjunct to go.
So when, to go , or, to be or any words, like it , to quickly, are used in that way they can not be split.
They are an adjective description of another segment, and as a verbal, now a noun, a thing it can not be split, if it is split, and technically I showed it can be done, but in doing so alters the structure and the segments of syntax and their parts and constituents and changes and alters how the interpretation of the sentence is understood.
However, if it is used as a constituent, to the verb as a modifer, as adjective, again a verbal, a noun now, to quickly, the new infinitive, and go being the verb referrent back to am going.
I am splitting to go, by inserting quickly, it becomes like, an adjective describing go, a noun referrent, because, becomes, it's constituent,adjective, description, when I do so.
To joins then, as part of quickly, and, to quickly, became the infinitive, and not to go.
Go changes to the verb refferent noun,while, to quickly is topicalized as the modifier, to the relevant right moving it there using hyberbattan, to focus the importance on how quickly I go, instead of saying , I go quickly, and going being the important fact and quickly only an after thought.
But I want the emphasis and focus to be on going, quickly. So I still want to edit it more and change it structure again.
So decide, what do you want the reader to focus on? What key point or fact is the most important for them to know?
Move the important points to the right side and the after thought, of secondary importance to the left side as an adjunct, modifier, being either and adjective or adverb, a constituent to the segment of syntax, it's argument.
Arguments being either the subject noun, sometimes the topic or theme (the agent/actor doing said action) the action being the verb, and the person whom the action is done to the patient, and the instrument being the item used to do the action.Those are also sometimes the topic or theme.
Highlight the focus on the topic or theme by moving it to the front of the sentence, or the front of that part or segment of syntax of phrase structure grammar.
In this case I want to focus on how quickly I went, and make that fact dramatic and clear that the fact I went quickly is my point.
Here is how it is hyperbattaned, topicalizing the theme, my point, to the front of the sentence.
Quickly, I go, now, to the store. Active. Urgent.
That sentence changed the focus.
Quickly is the adjective, topicalized, to the relevant right to highlight it, and I go, becomes active, in the moment, rather than saying to go, which is passive and a in the first sentence I want, to go, to the store is more passive, casual, not urgent, the tone is different when the infinitive verbal is used instead of the active urgent in the moment structure.
If I split the first sentence we alter it's structure.
Can we yes, but splitting the infinitive changed it.
The "want to go" with to go, was changed to "to quickly go", can I do this?
Yes, but when I did, to go was no longer the infinitive, so it is a trick question!
You can't split an infinitive, because in doing so , it alters its form and becomes a different element of syntax in the phrase structure of grammar if you do!
So full answer, yes you can do so, but it alters the whole meaning of the sentence and will not remain an infinitive if you do!
If you need it to remain an infinitive then do not split it!
You can split it but then it will no longer be an infinitive, then in the next attempt , the "to quickly" became the infinitive, a verbal, a noun, as it is a thing, I did ,to quickly, is describing go, which changed to the verb referrent, go then became a noun, a thing, so the "trick" of the question, is can you split the infinitive, yes, but not without altering and changing it, because then go became the verb referrent, back to , am going, as the verb!
Splitting it changes, the phrase structure and the semantic meaning. So if you need to communicate that exact thing, then do not alter it.
You can and should try to edit and alter it to see if there is a more effective way to write it , to communicate the focus and tone.
Show what is really important to you, to the reader, and signal what you want them to understand as being most important to you.
Put that on the right hand side as a constituent, and the less important to the relevant left side constituent of the segment.
Each segment of syntax in grammar, can be topicalized, but altering it does change it's semantic meaning.
If the "Subject Agent/Actor" is at the front then the voice and style , it is an active sentence and a formal.
If the " Patient, Direct Object Person/Place /Thing" , the action is done to or for, or the "Instrument" it is done with, the indirect object, obliques, constituents, then if those are moved to the front, to the relevant right of the sentence then the voice or style of writing is said to be passive and informal.
Quickly going now, to the store. Passive. Casual.
See how altering it changes tone? Mood. Semantic meaning!
See how I used hyperbattan to move the subject to the front again in this sentence, if it is the subject, the topic, I want to highlight, and by raising it to the fore, moving it to the relevant right side as a constituent to a segment of grammar then I focus the attention to it.
Most, adjuncts, being modifiers, adjectives, and adverbial modifiers,normally go to the relevant left side as a constituent to the argument, a fact, an element of the sentence, whether that element is the subject, the topic,the theme, or the subject as being focused on the agent the actor doing the action, to or for the direct object, whom, has the action done to it, as an oblique, objective case segment of syntax, or the thing which is used as an instrument to do it to them, the indirect possessive case argument, and it's constituents.
When it has one direct object or both direct and indirect objects then it is a transitive verb being the action!
Each argument can have one or more constituent descriptive adjunct modifiers for each argument, a fact, each segment of syntax has it's own relevant left side and more important focus of attention and cause of notice and impact to the semantic meaning understanding and helps the interpretation of the whole part, is the relevant right side constituent adjunct!
Usually each modifier, goes to the left, but to highlight it and move it to the relevant right side of the part of the sentence you want highlighted and to have people take notice topicalize it to the right, fore front of the segment of syntax.
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/606/01/
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/sentences.htm
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarlyvoice/sentencestructure
http://individual.utoronto.ca/ajhicks/grammar_html.html
"TO BE" IS A CONCEIT AS IT IS CIETO KINEO TO SHAPE OR FORM OR RENDER DESIGN ,TO ACT OR DO OR BE,TO SOMEONE OR SOMETHING,OR FOR SOMEONE OR SOMETHING AN ACTION OR BEING OR DOING TO THEM SOMETHING; WHERE AS "NOT TO BE" IS A CONCEPT AS IT IS APART SEPARATE LAYERS OF DETAILS,EXPOSITION OF THETAN, FACTS, ELEMENTS PERCEIVED, OF, A PERSON,PLACE OR THING, BUT IS NOT ACTING, OR BEING,OR DOING, ANYTHING TO, OR FOR, ANOTHER; SO "NOT TO BE" AS A CONCEPT IS INTRANSITIVE WITH NO DIRECT OR INDIRECT OBJECT IT ACTS TOWARDS OR FOR; AND "TO BE" IS A CONCEIT AND IS ACTION CHARGE, VALUE, DETERMINATION, CON TOGETHER CIETO/KINEO MOTION AND MOVEMENT TOWARDS, OR FOR, A PERSON, PLACE, OR THING, DIRECT OBJECT, OR INDIRECT OBJECT, AND IS TRANSITIVE CHANGING FORM, BEING, DOING, MOTION MOVEMENT, ACTION, TO OR FOR, SOMEONE OR SOMETHING, SO TRANSITIVE IS WHAT TO BE IS CONSIDERING, IN THE DECISION OF PREDICATE.
PREDICATE; PRE BEFORE, DI TWO, CATE AFTER, SO AS KANT WOULD SAY, COMPARE AND CONTRAST,THE EXTENT, REFLECT, DOES IT UPON REFLECTION COMPARE LIKEN TO A GROUP LATIVE TO SOMEONE OR SOMETHING, A CONCEIT, OR APART APO AWAY ABLATIVE CASE, A CONCEPT, WHEN REFLECTING UPON WHAT PHRASE STRUCTURE TO USE AS PART OF GRAMMAR WHEN DECIDING, DISPOCITO, STRUCTURE AND STYLE, PLACEMENT OF TYPE AND KIND OF PHRASE,AS ARISTOTLE'S POETICS EDUCATES US , WHEN COMPOSING, IN THE INSTANCE, WRITING AND DOCUMENTING FACTS EXPOSITION, NARRATIVE DETAIL AND WHEN BEING FLUENT, EASILY DETERMINING PARTS OF SYNTAX,DETERMINING PHRASES, DE OF, TERM TO SHAPE FORM CALL INTO BEING, IN IT'S ESSENCE AND NATURE,THE INATE FACTS, BORN OF,AND FROM, SEMIOTICS SIGNS, SYNEDOCHE REPRESENTATION NOMINALIZATION OF, IVUS IZE TO SHAPE TO FORM, INTO PHRASES,THE CONSTITUENTS ,OF THE MAIN ARGUMENTS, AS I SAY OR THINK AND BELIEVE IT IS UNDERSTOOD OR EXPERIENCED THROUGH EMPERIA OR AISTHETIA PERCEPTIBLE THINGS.
~KRISTA KAUFMAN 2018-02-12
To answer it, one must determine what the predicate is, and if the semantic meaning and interpretation of emperia, experience,through aisthetia,perceived things, determines it to be so; or not.
If the adjunct, being predicate, determines it to be done to or for someone or something, then it is transitive. It will have a direct object oblique, and / or an indirect object argument.
If the action or state of being, in it's extent, is perfect, unto itself, and does no action, to, or for another person, place or thing, then it is intransitive, because it has no direct object case, oblique,constituent argument, or indirect object, possessive case extent of constituent valence to an argument thetan, fact or element, for semantic purpose predicate of being who the action was done to or for, or given to or done for, if at all?
To be an advocate, for a client. (Transitive) (Conceit)
To be an advocate, a lawyer. (Intransitive) (Concept)
To instead be, a split infinitive, a transitive verbal and not a verb, can I split it?
If I want to say:
I want to go, quickly to the store.
That has "I want to go " as a subject, topic theme, focus, I , and want, to go, as want is my verb, and to go quickly to the store, is part of the predicate.
Can I split to go? Yes.
I can do so, I can split it, but, it is correct, but only because if the focus of my communication is to say ; I want to go quickly that should be my focus. How quickly I go , will be my emphasis.
I can, split, the oblique, the constituent parts, adjunct to the word instead, therefore, topicalizing it to the forefront of the sentence, or segment of syntax, to rheme and cause focus on it as topic.
I used hyperbatton, to add instead, the predicate, which adds semantic meaning for interpretation to the relevant left valency, instead of the usual relevant right, as by doing so , it then rhemes, focuses attention on the theme and topic I want to highlight for your notice.
In that situation I can do so as a "split infinitive" is a concept, an intransitive verbal noun like thing, a concept standing on it's own basis as extent.
However, if I were to say:
" I am going, to quickly go, to the store now."
Can I "split" the finitive verbs, if it is a conceit, an action, yes!
Will it change the structure, YES! If split, it will no longer remain an infinitive, the segment of syntax in grammar will alter!
I can do so, because by splitting it, I am trying to rheme it, to focus your attention on the topic of the sentence which I want you to take notice of; and that is, that I go quickly.
In the above , it still doesn't focus on how quickly I went, when I split it, to say, to quickly go, the, I am going, was in the right position as constituent so it made it the highest focus.
I go quickly, is a sentence fragment by itself, but at the end of the previous sentence I used to go as an infinitive verbal description adjunct rhemed to the relevant right of quickly, so going, is a thing, a noun, that I did, an action, but it is not a verb in that instance, am going, as it is describing the verb in the end sentence dependent clause, that can not stand on it's own but is subordinate to main independent clause.
So in that case, when I used the words, to quickly go, as a "thing" a noun, then it is an infinitive a verbal, not a verb and in that case can not be split!
"To quickly", is the new infinitive, it is a noun, a thing, I did, going, quickly.
An adjective modifier, adjunct to go.
So when, to go , or, to be or any words, like it , to quickly, are used in that way they can not be split.
They are an adjective description of another segment, and as a verbal, now a noun, a thing it can not be split, if it is split, and technically I showed it can be done, but in doing so alters the structure and the segments of syntax and their parts and constituents and changes and alters how the interpretation of the sentence is understood.
However, if it is used as a constituent, to the verb as a modifer, as adjective, again a verbal, a noun now, to quickly, the new infinitive, and go being the verb referrent back to am going.
I am splitting to go, by inserting quickly, it becomes like, an adjective describing go, a noun referrent, because, becomes, it's constituent,adjective, description, when I do so.
To joins then, as part of quickly, and, to quickly, became the infinitive, and not to go.
Go changes to the verb refferent noun,while, to quickly is topicalized as the modifier, to the relevant right moving it there using hyberbattan, to focus the importance on how quickly I go, instead of saying , I go quickly, and going being the important fact and quickly only an after thought.
But I want the emphasis and focus to be on going, quickly. So I still want to edit it more and change it structure again.
So decide, what do you want the reader to focus on? What key point or fact is the most important for them to know?
Move the important points to the right side and the after thought, of secondary importance to the left side as an adjunct, modifier, being either and adjective or adverb, a constituent to the segment of syntax, it's argument.
Arguments being either the subject noun, sometimes the topic or theme (the agent/actor doing said action) the action being the verb, and the person whom the action is done to the patient, and the instrument being the item used to do the action.Those are also sometimes the topic or theme.
Highlight the focus on the topic or theme by moving it to the front of the sentence, or the front of that part or segment of syntax of phrase structure grammar.
In this case I want to focus on how quickly I went, and make that fact dramatic and clear that the fact I went quickly is my point.
Here is how it is hyperbattaned, topicalizing the theme, my point, to the front of the sentence.
Quickly, I go, now, to the store. Active. Urgent.
That sentence changed the focus.
Quickly is the adjective, topicalized, to the relevant right to highlight it, and I go, becomes active, in the moment, rather than saying to go, which is passive and a in the first sentence I want, to go, to the store is more passive, casual, not urgent, the tone is different when the infinitive verbal is used instead of the active urgent in the moment structure.
If I split the first sentence we alter it's structure.
Can we yes, but splitting the infinitive changed it.
The "want to go" with to go, was changed to "to quickly go", can I do this?
Yes, but when I did, to go was no longer the infinitive, so it is a trick question!
You can't split an infinitive, because in doing so , it alters its form and becomes a different element of syntax in the phrase structure of grammar if you do!
So full answer, yes you can do so, but it alters the whole meaning of the sentence and will not remain an infinitive if you do!
If you need it to remain an infinitive then do not split it!
You can split it but then it will no longer be an infinitive, then in the next attempt , the "to quickly" became the infinitive, a verbal, a noun, as it is a thing, I did ,to quickly, is describing go, which changed to the verb referrent, go then became a noun, a thing, so the "trick" of the question, is can you split the infinitive, yes, but not without altering and changing it, because then go became the verb referrent, back to , am going, as the verb!
Splitting it changes, the phrase structure and the semantic meaning. So if you need to communicate that exact thing, then do not alter it.
You can and should try to edit and alter it to see if there is a more effective way to write it , to communicate the focus and tone.
Show what is really important to you, to the reader, and signal what you want them to understand as being most important to you.
Put that on the right hand side as a constituent, and the less important to the relevant left side constituent of the segment.
Each segment of syntax in grammar, can be topicalized, but altering it does change it's semantic meaning.
If the "Subject Agent/Actor" is at the front then the voice and style , it is an active sentence and a formal.
If the " Patient, Direct Object Person/Place /Thing" , the action is done to or for, or the "Instrument" it is done with, the indirect object, obliques, constituents, then if those are moved to the front, to the relevant right of the sentence then the voice or style of writing is said to be passive and informal.
Quickly going now, to the store. Passive. Casual.
See how altering it changes tone? Mood. Semantic meaning!
See how I used hyperbattan to move the subject to the front again in this sentence, if it is the subject, the topic, I want to highlight, and by raising it to the fore, moving it to the relevant right side as a constituent to a segment of grammar then I focus the attention to it.
Most, adjuncts, being modifiers, adjectives, and adverbial modifiers,normally go to the relevant left side as a constituent to the argument, a fact, an element of the sentence, whether that element is the subject, the topic,the theme, or the subject as being focused on the agent the actor doing the action, to or for the direct object, whom, has the action done to it, as an oblique, objective case segment of syntax, or the thing which is used as an instrument to do it to them, the indirect possessive case argument, and it's constituents.
When it has one direct object or both direct and indirect objects then it is a transitive verb being the action!
Each argument can have one or more constituent descriptive adjunct modifiers for each argument, a fact, each segment of syntax has it's own relevant left side and more important focus of attention and cause of notice and impact to the semantic meaning understanding and helps the interpretation of the whole part, is the relevant right side constituent adjunct!
Usually each modifier, goes to the left, but to highlight it and move it to the relevant right side of the part of the sentence you want highlighted and to have people take notice topicalize it to the right, fore front of the segment of syntax.
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/606/01/
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/sentences.htm
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarlyvoice/sentencestructure
http://individual.utoronto.ca/ajhicks/grammar_html.html
"TO BE" IS A CONCEIT AS IT IS CIETO KINEO TO SHAPE OR FORM OR RENDER DESIGN ,TO ACT OR DO OR BE,TO SOMEONE OR SOMETHING,OR FOR SOMEONE OR SOMETHING AN ACTION OR BEING OR DOING TO THEM SOMETHING; WHERE AS "NOT TO BE" IS A CONCEPT AS IT IS APART SEPARATE LAYERS OF DETAILS,EXPOSITION OF THETAN, FACTS, ELEMENTS PERCEIVED, OF, A PERSON,PLACE OR THING, BUT IS NOT ACTING, OR BEING,OR DOING, ANYTHING TO, OR FOR, ANOTHER; SO "NOT TO BE" AS A CONCEPT IS INTRANSITIVE WITH NO DIRECT OR INDIRECT OBJECT IT ACTS TOWARDS OR FOR; AND "TO BE" IS A CONCEIT AND IS ACTION CHARGE, VALUE, DETERMINATION, CON TOGETHER CIETO/KINEO MOTION AND MOVEMENT TOWARDS, OR FOR, A PERSON, PLACE, OR THING, DIRECT OBJECT, OR INDIRECT OBJECT, AND IS TRANSITIVE CHANGING FORM, BEING, DOING, MOTION MOVEMENT, ACTION, TO OR FOR, SOMEONE OR SOMETHING, SO TRANSITIVE IS WHAT TO BE IS CONSIDERING, IN THE DECISION OF PREDICATE.
PREDICATE; PRE BEFORE, DI TWO, CATE AFTER, SO AS KANT WOULD SAY, COMPARE AND CONTRAST,THE EXTENT, REFLECT, DOES IT UPON REFLECTION COMPARE LIKEN TO A GROUP LATIVE TO SOMEONE OR SOMETHING, A CONCEIT, OR APART APO AWAY ABLATIVE CASE, A CONCEPT, WHEN REFLECTING UPON WHAT PHRASE STRUCTURE TO USE AS PART OF GRAMMAR WHEN DECIDING, DISPOCITO, STRUCTURE AND STYLE, PLACEMENT OF TYPE AND KIND OF PHRASE,AS ARISTOTLE'S POETICS EDUCATES US , WHEN COMPOSING, IN THE INSTANCE, WRITING AND DOCUMENTING FACTS EXPOSITION, NARRATIVE DETAIL AND WHEN BEING FLUENT, EASILY DETERMINING PARTS OF SYNTAX,DETERMINING PHRASES, DE OF, TERM TO SHAPE FORM CALL INTO BEING, IN IT'S ESSENCE AND NATURE,THE INATE FACTS, BORN OF,AND FROM, SEMIOTICS SIGNS, SYNEDOCHE REPRESENTATION NOMINALIZATION OF, IVUS IZE TO SHAPE TO FORM, INTO PHRASES,THE CONSTITUENTS ,OF THE MAIN ARGUMENTS, AS I SAY OR THINK AND BELIEVE IT IS UNDERSTOOD OR EXPERIENCED THROUGH EMPERIA OR AISTHETIA PERCEPTIBLE THINGS.
~KRISTA KAUFMAN 2018-02-12
Sunday, 4 February 2018
Published on Jan 17, 2018
In 2012, the announcement of the Higgs boson made headlines around the world. But what has been going on at the Large Hadron Collider since? Physicist Harry Cliff will be your guide.
Subscribe for regular science videos: http://bit.ly/RiSubscRibe
Watch the Q&A here: https://youtu.be/JuVc_pIwVYE
What is the future of the world’s biggest physics experiment? And what intriguing hints of new physics are around the corner?
Harry Cliff is the Science Museum Fellow of Modern Science, which he reckons might be the only job title which begins and ends with 'science'. He spends half his time searching for signs of new physics at LHCb, one of the four big experiments at CERN's Large Hadron Collider. For the other half, he indulges his love of talking about physics at the Science Museum, where he develop exhibitions, events and online content.
This talk was filmed in the Royal Institution on 31 October 2017.
The Ri is on Twitter: http://twitter.com/ri_science
and Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/royalinstitution
and Tumblr: http://ri-science.tumblr.com/
Our editorial policy: http://www.rigb.org/home/editorial-po...
Subscribe for the latest science videos: http://bit.ly/RiNewsletter
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edvdzh9Pggg
Here are my thoughts.
It is NOT a "new boson", it is gravitational field, with the elements quarks /anti quarks vibrating under the electromagnetic gravitational field.
Internally the vacuum created, holds the anti matter central, and depending on what specific element it is,atomically, at the quark level, it is in quantum super position up/down north/ south and side to side east / west. It can be measured , not by a separate or new type of "higgs boson field" but rather the actual gravitational field, with the atomic weight against force, within the electromagnetic field, of current (+) and (-) polarity and the third part of the nuclear spin is the cross current or alternating current. They usually think this is dark matter. The reality, is is the three types of energy, and reflect the three dimensions of space.
The wave or field they refer to as higgs bose is just the wave or scattering of the particles after it has achieved fission/fusion and the photon isotopes scatter is then measurable. Three different scientists including higgs want to name this after themselves, but reality it is just different atomic chemistry elements under gravity.
It does not have different, "HIGGS" boson, it is the bose/einstein wave theory and when the gluons stretch it ,under exothermic energy ,then causing the fission/fusion cycle, at the core its anti matter ( - ) level it is under exothermic energy under pressure and at fission breaks to the smallest particles.
The negative (-) anti matter is under exothermic stress and force under electromagnetic field and gravitational field all while spinning under polarity and the force inward causes a vacuum as the gases are burned up at fission/fusion at the three levels, alpha,beta,gamma, then causes the radiation, photon , red, green, blue, energy colour and particle scatter after it happens.
When they the atomic gases/elements particals, vibrate in the quantum superposition, it is NOT a different FIELD it is SIMPLY a DIFFERENT ELEMENTAL PARTICLE! A different mass of atomic weight at force against gravity!
The weight of matter vs. the WEIGHTLESSNESS in the vacuum in the antimatter, quarks/antiquarks in the VACUUM with NO WEIGHT as there IS NO GRAVITY IN THERE JUST LIKE A BLACK HOLE PEOPLE!
The microcosm and the macrocosm! All science of God's creation reflects and reveals itself.
SO there IS NO HIGGS BOSON FIELD DIFFERENT THAN ALL OTHERS, there IS JUST different particles elements at VIBRATIONAL QUANTUM SUPERPOSITION and they are HELD UNDER GRAVITATIONAL FORCE UNDER EXOTHERMIC PRESSURE UNTIL IT ELONGATES STRETCHES UNDER COLLAPSE UPON ITSELF BEFORE FISSION!
When it does that the fission/fusion cycle, it is ALL UNDER THE SAME FIELD GRAVITY! NOT A NEW FIELD ! NOT "HIGGS BOSONS"
IT IS EMBARRASSING FOR THE SCIENTISTS to act as if they discovered a new field when it is just gauge /degree/ of measure/ of the time space warp under the gluon stretch elongating and in gravity under pressure its weight is the FORCE AND PRESSURE of its atomic weight!
AGAINST THE ACTUAL FIELD (NOT HIGGS BOSON FIELD ) BUT GRAVITY holding it in the WAVE of (+) and (-) attraction and repulsion as it comes bouncing up against the gravitational field created by its electromagnetic field of SPIN (+) and (+) = (-) and (-) and (-) =(+) so it INCREASES,GROWS ,MULTIPLIES THE GRAVITATIONAL ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD, ADDS PRESSURE, CREATES GREATER EXOTHERMIC ENERGY STRETCHING IT OUT (as the BIBLE says like curtains) and then when it UNDER PRESSURE STRETCHES INWARD COLLAPSING UNTIL WEAKENED GLUONS CREATED WEAKEN IT ,AT FISSION, THEN BIG BANG, ELECTRICAL CHARGE OF ALPHA BETA OR GAMMA RADIATION, LIGHT, ENERGY, PHOTONS ISOTOPES PARTICLE SCATTER . EQUAL AND OPPOSITE ENERGY! ENDOTHERMIC OUTWARD FORCE AND SPEED OF LIGHT!
THEN FUSION, IT ,THE PARTICLES, CAN NOT BE INDEPENDENT SO THEY HAVE TO UNDER LAWS OF ATTRACTION OF GRAVITY, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS ATTRACT AND BECOME HADRONS, AGAIN , MULTI FORMS!
SO NO THERE IS NO OTHER FIELD! IT IS STILL THE SAME FIELD !
IF YOU SO CALLED SCIENTISTS GET DIFFERENT MEASUREMENTS THEN IT IS JUST A DIFFERENT PARTICLE OF A DIFFERENT WEIGHT,AND MEASUREMENT OF ATOMIC WEIGHT, OF DIFFERENT CHEMICAL STRUCTURE OF GAS! NEVER ANOTHER FIELD!
SO NO OTHER FIELD! WAVE IS, TIME SPACE WARP, ELONGATION, BOSE / EINSTEIN TRYING TO PROVE WHAT THE BIBLE SAID IT WAS IN STRETCHING OUT UNDER COLLAPSE OF PRESSURE!
THE WAVE IS NOT HIGGS BOSONS!
IT IS THE EXOTHERMIC ENERGY UNDER ATOMIC WEIGHT OF CHEMICAL STRUCTURE OF GAS OR PARTICLE UNDER PRESSURE!
CALL IT WHAT IT IS!
EXOTHERMIC NOT ENDOTHERMIC WHICH HAPPENS AFTER FISSION FUSION AND ELECTRICAL PHOTON RADIATION CHARGE OF NUCLEAR ENEGRY AND GAMMA RADIATION AND ISOTOPES SCATTER YOU CAN MEASURE TRIANGULATE SIGNAL OF SCATTER AFTER OF EACH OF THE ENDOTHERMIC ENERGY SCATTER!
USE PROPER MATHS AND GRAVITY IN YOUR FORMULA NOT HIGGS FIELDS THERE ARE ONLY GRAVITY AND ATOMIC WEIGHT OF (+) QUARKS and the ANTI QUARKS (-) HAVE NO WEIGHT INSIDE THE VACUUM THEY ARE WEIGHTLESS AND INTERNALLY PULL INTO VACUUM ABSENT OF ELEMENT AS GAS THEN IN COLD FREEZES AT FISSION BURNS INTO GAS CONDENSATION GAS THE HYDROGEN ETC BURNED UP EMPTYING THE VACUUM AND SPACE!
WHY THERE IS NO AIR UP THERE AND ALL FLOATS AS NO GRAVITY INSIDE THE ANTI MATTER< SO SPACE WE ARE IN ANTI MATTER (-) POLARITY IN THE SPIN SO THERE IS THE EXTERNAL DIMENSION EXTERNAL AROUND OF MATTER (+) AND THE THIRD DIMENSION IS THE (+) and (-) IT COLLAPSING CROSSING POLARITY AND CAUSES THE ALTERNATING CURRENT AND SPIN THE THIRD LEVEL OR DIMENSION OF THE NUCLEAR SPINS! 1 is (+) 2 is (-) and 3 is CROSS ALTERNATING CURRENT !
THE THREE DIMENSIONS!
USE PROPER MATHS, AND GRAVITY IN YOUR FORMULA, NOT NEW HIGGS FIELDS THERE IS ONLY GRAVITY AND ATOMIC WEIGHT OF CHEMICAL OR GASES THE (+) QUARKS and the ANTI QUARKS (-) HAVE NO WEIGHT INSIDE THE VACUUM THEY ARE WEIGHTLESS AND INTERNALLY PULL INTO VACUUM ABSENT OF ELEMENTAL GAS THEN AT FUSION IN COLD FREEZES AT FISSION BURNS INTO GAS CONDENSATION WATER ,SO HENCE EVERY SCIENTIST EVERY WHERE SAYS:
WE FOUND WATER ON MARS , NO YOU FOUND GAS CHEMISTRY UNDER FISSION /FUSION CYCLE AT ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY UNDER GRAVITY!
GAS THE HYDROGEN ETC BURNED UP AT FUSION ENDOTHERMIC ENERGY RELEASE RADIATION OF PHOTON GAMMA PARTICLE SCATTER EMPTYING THE VACUUM AND SPACE!
PARTICLES CAN NOT BE INDIVIDUAL UNDER LAW OF ATTRACTION.
UNDER ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD AND GRAVITY THEY ATTRACT TO NEW PARTICLES TO FORM THE HADRONS!
WHY THERE IS NO AIR UP THERE IN SPACE THE (-) VACUUM IS CREATED AND WE ARE IN IT, ANTI MATTER (-) VACUUM OF SPACE, AND ALL FLOATS AS NO GRAVITY INSIDE THE ANTI MATTER < SO SPACE WE ARE IN ANTI MATTER (-) POLARITY IN THE SPIN OF GRAVITY UNDER EXOTHERMIC PRESSURE SO THERE IS THE EXTERNAL DIMENSION, EXTERNAL AROUND ALL OF EARTHS MATTER (+) SECOND DIMENSION, AND THE THIRD DIMENSION IS THE (+) and (-) IT COLLAPSING CROSSING POLARITY AND CAUSES THE ALTERNATING CURRENT AND SPIN THE THIRD LEVEL OR DIMENSION OF THE NUCLEAR SPINS!
1 is (+) 2 is (-) and 3 is CROSS ALTERNATING CURRENT !
IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME AT THE MICROCOSM AS IT IS AT THE MACROCOSM !
TWO POLARITIES AND THE THIRD BEING CROSS OR ALTERNATING CURRENT OF THE NUCLEAR LEVEL GRAVITATIONAL SPIN OF GRAVITY UNDER EXOTHERMIC PRESSURE AND STRESS WITH THE UNIVERSE STRETCHING FORTH OUT UNDER PRESSURE AND ONE DAY WILL COLLAPSE IN, AND BIG BANG AGAIN, FISSION FUSION CYCLE ON THE MACRO LEVEL> SO WHY ARE YOU DARING TO PUT FORTH THE PRIDEFUL STUPIDITY THAT THERE IS ANOTHER FIELD?
OTHER THAN GRAVITY?
IT IS NOT! IT IS JUST GRAVITY!
THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD AT MICROCOSM LEVEL!
THE DIFFERENT MEASUREMENTS ARE JUST DIFFERENT ATOMIC ELEMENTS OR GASEOUS CHEMISTRY ELEMENTS AT PRESSURE!
Your video:
If this energy fields causes mass energy is out there 14 :30 ?- HERE IS A CLUE NEWTON DISCOVERED IT WAY BACK BEFORE HIGGS DID PEOPLE IT IS CALLED GRAVITY! - NOT A NEW FIELD CALLED HIGGS!
*ROLLS EYES*
BOSE /EINSTEIN IN THE EARLY 20 TH CENTURY FOUND THE TIME SPACE WARP! WHAT IS IT? THE CROSS CURRENT OF THE POLARITY IN SPIN PEOPLE? IT IS THE EXOTHERMIC ENERGY INWARD CAUSING THE STRETCHING OUT AND THE TWO POLARITIES CAUSE THE PUSH PULL OF THE CURRENT AND ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD AND THE VIBRATIONAL ENERGY WAVE OF EXOTHERMIC AND ENDOTHERMIC ENERGY! THE PULL INWARD IN A VACUUM. INTERIOR COLLAPSE, EXTERIOR SCATTER AT THE FORCE OF NUCLEAR ELECTRICAL CHARGE AND ENERGY AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT, ITS PARTICLES HELD BY GRAVITY AND BOUND UNDER ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD.
GET THE HIGGS OUT OF THERE! GLUONS (+) / W (-) and PHOTONS (+)/ Z (-) GLUONS AND PHOTONS ARE THE CHARGE OF (+) ELECTRICAL NUCLEAR ENERGY CHARGE (+) , and the W and Z are the (-) and the SPIN of them causes another electromagnetic nuclear spin and cross current alternating current in the GRAVITATIONAL FIELD.
THE UP /DOWN are the (+) and the (-) all pulled and pushed AGAINST GRAVITY OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD SO NO HIGGS FIELD AT ALL!
UP/DOWN SIDE /SIDE IS THE 4 QUANTUM SUPERPOSITIONS! VIBRATIONAL WAVES IN MOTION!
LIKE IN THE BIBLE WHEN GOD MOVED! ;)
WHEN GOD MOVED CLOSER TO OR FURTHER FROM IT, HE ALTERED THE ENERGY THAT HAS THE FIVE MAIN GASES AND IN COMBINATIONS FORM THE ELEMENTS AND MOVING ENERGY CAUSES SOUND TONE HUM WORDS LANGE,SOUND, AND GOD SPOKE IT ALL INTO BEING BY HIM THE ENERGY MOVING AND HIM MOVING CLOSE CAUSED PRESSURE BIG BANG FISSION AND GASES BURNED UP AND THE ICE FROM THE VACUUM OF THE COMPRESSED OXYGEN HYDROGEN UNDER PRESSURE EXOTHERMIC BECOMES CONDENSATION AND WATER! UNDER ENDOTHERMIC ENERGY! AND GOD CREATED WATER! ; ) AND HE MOVED AND CREATED IT ALL LIGHT AT FISSION FUSION AND ALPHA BETA GAMMA RADIATION ALL HELD BY GRAVITY AND FORCED INWARD UNDER EXOTHERMIC TO CREATE NEW MATTER AND THE FISSION FUSION SCATTER THEN JOINS IT TO NEW HADRON FORMS TO CREATE NEW ATOMIC ELEMENTS AND THAT IS HOW HE GOD CREATED IT ALL IN THE BEGINNING! CREATION IS EXACT AND SCIENCE! ;)
Dark Matter is NOT unknown! Space is Anti matter (-) vacuum , then the next dimension of (+) gravitational electromagnetic field, and then the third dimension or Heaven, is cross current , alternating current in the SPIN, so dark matter, is the exchange and crossing of the quarks (+)/antiquarks (-) through the energy field causing a cross current of alternating polarity, which causes the growth and stretching out as the (+) and (+) come in contact and CREATE the (-) and the (-) and (-) come in contact and CREATE the (+) and it GROWS and MULTIPLIES and INCREASES as GOD SAID in the beginning, and STRETCHES FORTH AMEN! PRAISE JESUS HE IS A WONDROUS AND AWESOME GOD AMEN!
Psalm 104:2 The LORD wraps himself in light as with a garment; he ...
biblehub.com/psalms/104-2.htm
New International Version The LORD wraps himself in light as with a garment; he stretches out the heavens like a tent. New Living Translation You are dressed in a robe of light. You stretch out the starry curtain of the heavens; English Standard Version covering yourself with light as with a garment, stretching out the ...
In 2012, the announcement of the Higgs boson made headlines around the world. But what has been going on at the Large Hadron Collider since? Physicist Harry Cliff will be your guide.
Subscribe for regular science videos: http://bit.ly/RiSubscRibe
Watch the Q&A here: https://youtu.be/JuVc_pIwVYE
What is the future of the world’s biggest physics experiment? And what intriguing hints of new physics are around the corner?
Harry Cliff is the Science Museum Fellow of Modern Science, which he reckons might be the only job title which begins and ends with 'science'. He spends half his time searching for signs of new physics at LHCb, one of the four big experiments at CERN's Large Hadron Collider. For the other half, he indulges his love of talking about physics at the Science Museum, where he develop exhibitions, events and online content.
This talk was filmed in the Royal Institution on 31 October 2017.
The Ri is on Twitter: http://twitter.com/ri_science
and Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/royalinstitution
and Tumblr: http://ri-science.tumblr.com/
Our editorial policy: http://www.rigb.org/home/editorial-po...
Subscribe for the latest science videos: http://bit.ly/RiNewsletter
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edvdzh9Pggg
Here are my thoughts.
It is NOT a "new boson", it is gravitational field, with the elements quarks /anti quarks vibrating under the electromagnetic gravitational field.
Internally the vacuum created, holds the anti matter central, and depending on what specific element it is,atomically, at the quark level, it is in quantum super position up/down north/ south and side to side east / west. It can be measured , not by a separate or new type of "higgs boson field" but rather the actual gravitational field, with the atomic weight against force, within the electromagnetic field, of current (+) and (-) polarity and the third part of the nuclear spin is the cross current or alternating current. They usually think this is dark matter. The reality, is is the three types of energy, and reflect the three dimensions of space.
The wave or field they refer to as higgs bose is just the wave or scattering of the particles after it has achieved fission/fusion and the photon isotopes scatter is then measurable. Three different scientists including higgs want to name this after themselves, but reality it is just different atomic chemistry elements under gravity.
It does not have different, "HIGGS" boson, it is the bose/einstein wave theory and when the gluons stretch it ,under exothermic energy ,then causing the fission/fusion cycle, at the core its anti matter ( - ) level it is under exothermic energy under pressure and at fission breaks to the smallest particles.
The negative (-) anti matter is under exothermic stress and force under electromagnetic field and gravitational field all while spinning under polarity and the force inward causes a vacuum as the gases are burned up at fission/fusion at the three levels, alpha,beta,gamma, then causes the radiation, photon , red, green, blue, energy colour and particle scatter after it happens.
When they the atomic gases/elements particals, vibrate in the quantum superposition, it is NOT a different FIELD it is SIMPLY a DIFFERENT ELEMENTAL PARTICLE! A different mass of atomic weight at force against gravity!
The weight of matter vs. the WEIGHTLESSNESS in the vacuum in the antimatter, quarks/antiquarks in the VACUUM with NO WEIGHT as there IS NO GRAVITY IN THERE JUST LIKE A BLACK HOLE PEOPLE!
The microcosm and the macrocosm! All science of God's creation reflects and reveals itself.
SO there IS NO HIGGS BOSON FIELD DIFFERENT THAN ALL OTHERS, there IS JUST different particles elements at VIBRATIONAL QUANTUM SUPERPOSITION and they are HELD UNDER GRAVITATIONAL FORCE UNDER EXOTHERMIC PRESSURE UNTIL IT ELONGATES STRETCHES UNDER COLLAPSE UPON ITSELF BEFORE FISSION!
When it does that the fission/fusion cycle, it is ALL UNDER THE SAME FIELD GRAVITY! NOT A NEW FIELD ! NOT "HIGGS BOSONS"
IT IS EMBARRASSING FOR THE SCIENTISTS to act as if they discovered a new field when it is just gauge /degree/ of measure/ of the time space warp under the gluon stretch elongating and in gravity under pressure its weight is the FORCE AND PRESSURE of its atomic weight!
AGAINST THE ACTUAL FIELD (NOT HIGGS BOSON FIELD ) BUT GRAVITY holding it in the WAVE of (+) and (-) attraction and repulsion as it comes bouncing up against the gravitational field created by its electromagnetic field of SPIN (+) and (+) = (-) and (-) and (-) =(+) so it INCREASES,GROWS ,MULTIPLIES THE GRAVITATIONAL ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD, ADDS PRESSURE, CREATES GREATER EXOTHERMIC ENERGY STRETCHING IT OUT (as the BIBLE says like curtains) and then when it UNDER PRESSURE STRETCHES INWARD COLLAPSING UNTIL WEAKENED GLUONS CREATED WEAKEN IT ,AT FISSION, THEN BIG BANG, ELECTRICAL CHARGE OF ALPHA BETA OR GAMMA RADIATION, LIGHT, ENERGY, PHOTONS ISOTOPES PARTICLE SCATTER . EQUAL AND OPPOSITE ENERGY! ENDOTHERMIC OUTWARD FORCE AND SPEED OF LIGHT!
THEN FUSION, IT ,THE PARTICLES, CAN NOT BE INDEPENDENT SO THEY HAVE TO UNDER LAWS OF ATTRACTION OF GRAVITY, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS ATTRACT AND BECOME HADRONS, AGAIN , MULTI FORMS!
SO NO THERE IS NO OTHER FIELD! IT IS STILL THE SAME FIELD !
IF YOU SO CALLED SCIENTISTS GET DIFFERENT MEASUREMENTS THEN IT IS JUST A DIFFERENT PARTICLE OF A DIFFERENT WEIGHT,AND MEASUREMENT OF ATOMIC WEIGHT, OF DIFFERENT CHEMICAL STRUCTURE OF GAS! NEVER ANOTHER FIELD!
SO NO OTHER FIELD! WAVE IS, TIME SPACE WARP, ELONGATION, BOSE / EINSTEIN TRYING TO PROVE WHAT THE BIBLE SAID IT WAS IN STRETCHING OUT UNDER COLLAPSE OF PRESSURE!
THE WAVE IS NOT HIGGS BOSONS!
IT IS THE EXOTHERMIC ENERGY UNDER ATOMIC WEIGHT OF CHEMICAL STRUCTURE OF GAS OR PARTICLE UNDER PRESSURE!
CALL IT WHAT IT IS!
EXOTHERMIC NOT ENDOTHERMIC WHICH HAPPENS AFTER FISSION FUSION AND ELECTRICAL PHOTON RADIATION CHARGE OF NUCLEAR ENEGRY AND GAMMA RADIATION AND ISOTOPES SCATTER YOU CAN MEASURE TRIANGULATE SIGNAL OF SCATTER AFTER OF EACH OF THE ENDOTHERMIC ENERGY SCATTER!
USE PROPER MATHS AND GRAVITY IN YOUR FORMULA NOT HIGGS FIELDS THERE ARE ONLY GRAVITY AND ATOMIC WEIGHT OF (+) QUARKS and the ANTI QUARKS (-) HAVE NO WEIGHT INSIDE THE VACUUM THEY ARE WEIGHTLESS AND INTERNALLY PULL INTO VACUUM ABSENT OF ELEMENT AS GAS THEN IN COLD FREEZES AT FISSION BURNS INTO GAS CONDENSATION GAS THE HYDROGEN ETC BURNED UP EMPTYING THE VACUUM AND SPACE!
WHY THERE IS NO AIR UP THERE AND ALL FLOATS AS NO GRAVITY INSIDE THE ANTI MATTER< SO SPACE WE ARE IN ANTI MATTER (-) POLARITY IN THE SPIN SO THERE IS THE EXTERNAL DIMENSION EXTERNAL AROUND OF MATTER (+) AND THE THIRD DIMENSION IS THE (+) and (-) IT COLLAPSING CROSSING POLARITY AND CAUSES THE ALTERNATING CURRENT AND SPIN THE THIRD LEVEL OR DIMENSION OF THE NUCLEAR SPINS! 1 is (+) 2 is (-) and 3 is CROSS ALTERNATING CURRENT !
THE THREE DIMENSIONS!
USE PROPER MATHS, AND GRAVITY IN YOUR FORMULA, NOT NEW HIGGS FIELDS THERE IS ONLY GRAVITY AND ATOMIC WEIGHT OF CHEMICAL OR GASES THE (+) QUARKS and the ANTI QUARKS (-) HAVE NO WEIGHT INSIDE THE VACUUM THEY ARE WEIGHTLESS AND INTERNALLY PULL INTO VACUUM ABSENT OF ELEMENTAL GAS THEN AT FUSION IN COLD FREEZES AT FISSION BURNS INTO GAS CONDENSATION WATER ,SO HENCE EVERY SCIENTIST EVERY WHERE SAYS:
WE FOUND WATER ON MARS , NO YOU FOUND GAS CHEMISTRY UNDER FISSION /FUSION CYCLE AT ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY UNDER GRAVITY!
GAS THE HYDROGEN ETC BURNED UP AT FUSION ENDOTHERMIC ENERGY RELEASE RADIATION OF PHOTON GAMMA PARTICLE SCATTER EMPTYING THE VACUUM AND SPACE!
PARTICLES CAN NOT BE INDIVIDUAL UNDER LAW OF ATTRACTION.
UNDER ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD AND GRAVITY THEY ATTRACT TO NEW PARTICLES TO FORM THE HADRONS!
WHY THERE IS NO AIR UP THERE IN SPACE THE (-) VACUUM IS CREATED AND WE ARE IN IT, ANTI MATTER (-) VACUUM OF SPACE, AND ALL FLOATS AS NO GRAVITY INSIDE THE ANTI MATTER < SO SPACE WE ARE IN ANTI MATTER (-) POLARITY IN THE SPIN OF GRAVITY UNDER EXOTHERMIC PRESSURE SO THERE IS THE EXTERNAL DIMENSION, EXTERNAL AROUND ALL OF EARTHS MATTER (+) SECOND DIMENSION, AND THE THIRD DIMENSION IS THE (+) and (-) IT COLLAPSING CROSSING POLARITY AND CAUSES THE ALTERNATING CURRENT AND SPIN THE THIRD LEVEL OR DIMENSION OF THE NUCLEAR SPINS!
1 is (+) 2 is (-) and 3 is CROSS ALTERNATING CURRENT !
IT IS EXACTLY THE SAME AT THE MICROCOSM AS IT IS AT THE MACROCOSM !
TWO POLARITIES AND THE THIRD BEING CROSS OR ALTERNATING CURRENT OF THE NUCLEAR LEVEL GRAVITATIONAL SPIN OF GRAVITY UNDER EXOTHERMIC PRESSURE AND STRESS WITH THE UNIVERSE STRETCHING FORTH OUT UNDER PRESSURE AND ONE DAY WILL COLLAPSE IN, AND BIG BANG AGAIN, FISSION FUSION CYCLE ON THE MACRO LEVEL> SO WHY ARE YOU DARING TO PUT FORTH THE PRIDEFUL STUPIDITY THAT THERE IS ANOTHER FIELD?
OTHER THAN GRAVITY?
IT IS NOT! IT IS JUST GRAVITY!
THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD AT MICROCOSM LEVEL!
THE DIFFERENT MEASUREMENTS ARE JUST DIFFERENT ATOMIC ELEMENTS OR GASEOUS CHEMISTRY ELEMENTS AT PRESSURE!
Your video:
If this energy fields causes mass energy is out there 14 :30 ?- HERE IS A CLUE NEWTON DISCOVERED IT WAY BACK BEFORE HIGGS DID PEOPLE IT IS CALLED GRAVITY! - NOT A NEW FIELD CALLED HIGGS!
*ROLLS EYES*
BOSE /EINSTEIN IN THE EARLY 20 TH CENTURY FOUND THE TIME SPACE WARP! WHAT IS IT? THE CROSS CURRENT OF THE POLARITY IN SPIN PEOPLE? IT IS THE EXOTHERMIC ENERGY INWARD CAUSING THE STRETCHING OUT AND THE TWO POLARITIES CAUSE THE PUSH PULL OF THE CURRENT AND ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD AND THE VIBRATIONAL ENERGY WAVE OF EXOTHERMIC AND ENDOTHERMIC ENERGY! THE PULL INWARD IN A VACUUM. INTERIOR COLLAPSE, EXTERIOR SCATTER AT THE FORCE OF NUCLEAR ELECTRICAL CHARGE AND ENERGY AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT, ITS PARTICLES HELD BY GRAVITY AND BOUND UNDER ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD.
GET THE HIGGS OUT OF THERE! GLUONS (+) / W (-) and PHOTONS (+)/ Z (-) GLUONS AND PHOTONS ARE THE CHARGE OF (+) ELECTRICAL NUCLEAR ENERGY CHARGE (+) , and the W and Z are the (-) and the SPIN of them causes another electromagnetic nuclear spin and cross current alternating current in the GRAVITATIONAL FIELD.
THE UP /DOWN are the (+) and the (-) all pulled and pushed AGAINST GRAVITY OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD SO NO HIGGS FIELD AT ALL!
UP/DOWN SIDE /SIDE IS THE 4 QUANTUM SUPERPOSITIONS! VIBRATIONAL WAVES IN MOTION!
LIKE IN THE BIBLE WHEN GOD MOVED! ;)
WHEN GOD MOVED CLOSER TO OR FURTHER FROM IT, HE ALTERED THE ENERGY THAT HAS THE FIVE MAIN GASES AND IN COMBINATIONS FORM THE ELEMENTS AND MOVING ENERGY CAUSES SOUND TONE HUM WORDS LANGE,SOUND, AND GOD SPOKE IT ALL INTO BEING BY HIM THE ENERGY MOVING AND HIM MOVING CLOSE CAUSED PRESSURE BIG BANG FISSION AND GASES BURNED UP AND THE ICE FROM THE VACUUM OF THE COMPRESSED OXYGEN HYDROGEN UNDER PRESSURE EXOTHERMIC BECOMES CONDENSATION AND WATER! UNDER ENDOTHERMIC ENERGY! AND GOD CREATED WATER! ; ) AND HE MOVED AND CREATED IT ALL LIGHT AT FISSION FUSION AND ALPHA BETA GAMMA RADIATION ALL HELD BY GRAVITY AND FORCED INWARD UNDER EXOTHERMIC TO CREATE NEW MATTER AND THE FISSION FUSION SCATTER THEN JOINS IT TO NEW HADRON FORMS TO CREATE NEW ATOMIC ELEMENTS AND THAT IS HOW HE GOD CREATED IT ALL IN THE BEGINNING! CREATION IS EXACT AND SCIENCE! ;)
Dark Matter is NOT unknown! Space is Anti matter (-) vacuum , then the next dimension of (+) gravitational electromagnetic field, and then the third dimension or Heaven, is cross current , alternating current in the SPIN, so dark matter, is the exchange and crossing of the quarks (+)/antiquarks (-) through the energy field causing a cross current of alternating polarity, which causes the growth and stretching out as the (+) and (+) come in contact and CREATE the (-) and the (-) and (-) come in contact and CREATE the (+) and it GROWS and MULTIPLIES and INCREASES as GOD SAID in the beginning, and STRETCHES FORTH AMEN! PRAISE JESUS HE IS A WONDROUS AND AWESOME GOD AMEN!
Psalm 104:2 The LORD wraps himself in light as with a garment; he ...
biblehub.com/psalms/104-2.htm
New International Version The LORD wraps himself in light as with a garment; he stretches out the heavens like a tent. New Living Translation You are dressed in a robe of light. You stretch out the starry curtain of the heavens; English Standard Version covering yourself with light as with a garment, stretching out the ...
Friday, 2 February 2018
Theory Of Everything : Creation Science vs. Evolution of the Universe : How it all works
My Theory
By Krista Kaufman
When gas is compressed in a star, exothermic ,it has a vacuum in the exothermic force in the gravitational electromagnetic energy polarity of spin, with einstein/bose wave time space warp occurring when the gluons cause the stretching out until it weakens and breaks at fission.
When that happens, then it causes the radiation, light, heat of nuclear radiation and particle quark scatter and they do join to new particles to form hadrons then they do create new stars atoms!
The endothermic energy,outward energy is what caused heat after fission happens, at fission, not before, so your segment was off as you indicated , the pressure causes the heat , but in fact it causes the opposite, the exothermic inward pressure causes the vacuum in space and hence freezing temperatures and therefore the ice, and when under pressure the qaurks(+) / anti-quarks (-) become unstable and collide they, after it weakens, the gluons stretch it out, into the strange shape, with the time space warp of vibrational wave pattern of frequency of energy, see einstein/bose theory to explain that, and understand, but at the actual fission, breaking apart, big bang, nuclear fission electromagnetic radiation energy scatter of radiation isotopes etc particles join to others form hadrons then as stable atoms they are endothermic outward charge heat, and in the fusion cycle and newly increasing charge of the coming together of the (+) and (+) =(-) and (-) and (-) =(+) as more and more are attracted by electromagnetic attraction then the increase field shift of polarity increases, each joining like, causes equal and opposite reaction, charge and spin, and movement of gravitational field, as it all grows , increases, stretches out the polarity field shifts spins, and moves at vibrational frequency of electricity and has hum pitch tone and sound and wave pattern causes the time space dimensions, the warp is the wave frequency up and down in pitch tone and register moving in vibration due toalternating current,with the quarks in all 4 simultaneous quantum superpositions, north, south, up/down west, east back/forth at once, the crossing of charge causes the alternating current and the wave frequency vibration.
The dimension, warp in time and space, all dimensions occupying the same space at once, with quantum positioning, that is how God in energy form being can be in all places at once, it is like the energy, nuclear energy, at all 3 main levels Aplha, Beta, Gamma, Red, Green, Blue, radiation of light, in each level of the heavenlies, the frequency vibration charge of energy vibrates differently, at a different gauge degree level of boson, causing gravitational hold barrier in each, only quarks the smallest particles can be at quantum superposition all 4 places of polarity alternating current vibrational wave at one time, SO God must be energy formation at the qaurk/anti-quark level and all that is not reconciled with HIM, collides and friction, and fission breaks and separation in BIG BANG, so all has to be stable and reconciled to HIM and stable on HIS vibrational frequency, if not then it is at chaos and if under pressure it is volatile will collide and BIG BANG NUCLEAR EXPLOSION, like in the bible when the sky will roll back and like nuclear energy exploding out flesh will melt off bone killing all and those spirits energy will then die and raise up as quarks/anti-quarks can not be separate or individual in electromagnetic field of charge gravity they are attracted and become rejoined to new particles and form hadrons so in that case, we under gravitational force shifting, all gravity alters under electromagnetic change of field gravity level of force, we raise up to HIM join HIM in the heavenlies in a moment in a twinkling of an eye.
Enjoy the full Bible Study at the start, and then watch science at the end.
How it all happens; Science of the Universe and it's Physics
The magnetic field would increase pressure as it collapses as fission/fusion cycle happens through the 1 Atomic ,Neutron, stable, then Protons unstable ,under pressure, volatility, Electron, Muon,Tau unstable friction collision happens, red,green,blue alpha,beta,gamma matter +/- anti-matter cycle (6) decay death cycle , the 8th end regeneration as it explodes and then joins to new matter,forms hadrons, individual particles can not survive they through law of attraction under gravitational force, have to be joined to new matter,hadrons,then its stable again, but that, before it does collapse, when it compresses the force would cause increased energy electricity nuclear energy at fission radiation, isotopes etc. when pressure seals it through force and pressure during collapse and like the nuclear bombs when unsealed they remain stable when sealed become unstable volatile under pressure, and collision fission/fusion cycle would explode when gluons increase it weakens, stretches and then breaks,fission,radiation, endothermic energy, outward, then particles rejoin to new hadrons so after the 3 +/- cycles of decay and destruction the final one after proton- electrons, muon,tau then it would explode and the particles under physics can not remain isolated they have to attract to other particles and form new atomic matter to be stable again hadrons ,neutrons, protons,and the electrons would remain so and as the + and + make - and the - and - make + the magnetic field grows and spins in polarity again the bose/einstein wave theory is why it stretches out like curtains because of the warp in the time space continuum during the fission when it breaks apart and elongates just prior, because of the gluons, the gluons happens when it is weak, stretches minimal collision force needed to break, exothermic force in, fission,then it breaks, at collision, when it becomes unstable under increased exothermic pressure and then is volatile, when it is weak enough then it takes very little force of collision and then fission occurs. The endothermic forces it outward particles join to form new hadrons after they collide,and the exothermic draws it in under gravitational electromagnetic force of polarity and spin.The more it draws in under exothermic stress that is when it stretches out, like curtains. The bible describes it. Same with when the particles Quarks, (+)/(-) are at the smallest quantum superpositions as they are reduced beyond gamma radiation each fission/fusion cycle they are at 4 simultaneous quantum superpositions, particles quarks(+) /anti-quark (-) particles join to new formed hadrons, all at the same time in the full double polarity spin under electromagnetic force and gravity, so it is also just like how the bible describes the wheels of gods throne, his chariot with the faces of the spirit of nuclear energy they angels are at full nuclear type quantum superposition so they appear as the faces are in 4 places at the same time but it is just one being.
The chariot, 4 seraphim, 2 cherubim at the mercy seat with YHVH JESUS GOD in the mercy seat the 7, the candle sticks the menorah in the temple represent his chariot and enthroned presence. He is the energy and force of the universe and moves and vibrates in momentum as genesis says HE moves, electricity has pitch and tone and produces sound, words, and nuclear, energy the 5 basic atomic particles in it form the basis in chemistry for all other atomic chemical structure at the microcosm of space in the minutia HE created by moving causing pressure force fission/fusion created new hardons elemental particles and atomic structure in the minute microcosm and in the large macrocosm in the universe and stars you were talking about the stars spin under double polarity gravitational spin, the gluons cause the quarks to stretch and elongate which causes the strange shape of the stars that you showed on screen , it is in collapse, weakens, and under exothermic pressure in it becomes more volatile unstable until pressure of colliding quarkss(+)/(-) anti-quarks at full quantum superpostion inhabit the same space and BIG BANG! Nuclear fission breaks! GAMMA RADIATION =BLUE the same at chemical level in us too! Alpha,Beta ,Gamma RED, GREEN,BLUE, so when you showed BLUE star it is at collapse, it will stretch under time space WAVE bose/einstein theory where warp in the time space continuum happens, Boson Gauge degree of increased pressure and charge, it under pressure of endo outward or exo inward either alters the hydrogen oxygen etc the 5 main underlying chemistry of the particles atoms in the gaseous atmosphere, and just like water in extreme cold in the vacuum in the internal exothermic pressure, that is why there is a black hole it becomes a vacuum in space and all freezes, when it the qaurks/anti quarks are stretched until gluons form and slight collision caused fission then charge bang radiation gamma radiation particles, isotopes scatter, under radiation,light is created, and travels, re: einsteins explanation of speed of light, and qaurks can not be isolated they attract to electromagnetic force of gravity spin to other qaurks form hadrons,new atoms and under stable spin increase charge electromagnetic energy grows charge endothermic outward energy causes increase boson gauge degree of heat charge of electricity and that heat melts gas then causes like ice to become water and heat endothermic creates water,condensation, that is how in the beginning water was formed as GOD moved in vibrational wave patterns of energy at frequency and pitch and tone the hum in space caused sound and words......in the beginning......;) CREATION SCIENCE ! BIG BANG INDEED! ;) GOD YHVH DOES BIG THINGS HE IS ALMIGHTY AND WONDERFUL HE IS AWESOME AMEN! :)
THAT ....is the THEORY OF EVERYTHING.......GO challenge the scientists, that do not believe and share that with them!
IT EXPLAINS IT ALL!
Also, the jewish scripture says in the beginning , time periods designated, a day is like a thousand years, meaning a specific and exact measure of time . Never said exact length or precise measure but it used the conceit and concept of 1 day=1000 years = a metric degree of measurement..........go explain that to the scientists! :) ;) ~Krista
PROGRAM: QUICK STUDY!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIkBgmjNlpo
Posted by Krista Kaufman at 23:13 Feb 1 2018
That is why the escatology people who think there is seven years after, go back and READ the bible to realize when the sky rolls back and it is nuclear event then there is no seven years after all are not left, the earth is desolate and will remain so for a metric specified designated time, 1 day is as a 1000 years, until it too earth goes through the 3 alpha beta gamma radiation death decay cycles until its final explosion and particles go out to GOD and join HIM he then MOVES and recreates ALL, all over again! A new heaven and a new earth reconciled to HIM AMEN!
That is why like when the jews were in egypt, they before Moses was sent by GOD to tell Pharoah to let them go and GOD did not just remove them they went through all ten plagues, and there was light in Goshen, same with the end, the church ingrafted as one in HIM will go through all the end times here and only when there is no point beyond and no other can be saved then HE will remove the church amen! The people who think the church goes then all others are left no. We are there through to the end. Think about it, if the church was gone why would the saints suffer? Just something to ponder.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
IN THE MIDDLE OF TYPING THIS AND HERE IS WHAT THEY DID Note I was working typing they remote access, attack erased much of what I typ...
-
First to write a ballade, or sonnet a traditional 14 line poem, you can write it like Petrarch, who wrote an octave, that is two qautrains ...
-
https://blog.verisign.com/security/increasing-the-strength-of-the-zone-signing-key-for-the-root-zone/ DO NOT REMOVE UNDER PENALTY OF OBSTRUC...
-
Note I was working typing they remote access, attack erased much of what I typed, you can see they erased entire sections and left partial i...
